Tuesday, November 01, 2011

1.11.11...

Justify FullSo I'm torn between two IKEA white leather two-seat sofas for my new flat. What do you guys think? KARLSTAD or KIVIK? I personally like the shape of KARLSTAD but I also love the idea of being able to lie flat on KIVIK.

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

Karlstad

Unknown said...

The KIVIK is more chic looking in my opinion. I'd go with that!

b3nc0 said...

KIVIK alright! If you got the place, go for it. I love the sober design & the lying flat is certainly a great feature too...

Anonymous said...

Definitely Karlstadt. It has much cleaner lines as opposed to the Kivik with its taxi cab back seat cushions. -d

Random GCruiser said...

KARLSTAD, definitely. It's softer on the eye. The KIVIK looks like a sterile, futuristic banal piece from 2001: A Space Odyssey or something

Joe said...

KARLSTAD! It looks a lot more comfy. :D

Anonymous said...

I think they are both incredibly ugly but the Karlstadt is marginally less ugly.

D.C. said...

If you don't like the feeling of being boxed in, I think the Kivik will add space to your space. No one really needs arm rests. Invision naps on that thing! It looks so comfortable that I want one now. Go Kivik! :)

kTROY said...

Stay away from IKEA uphostered furniture! The quality blows.

Anonymous said...

Someone's going to flop on your Karlstad and wreck those legs. I've go with the Kivik, but I think that one's ugly.

Chris said...

Get something more elegant, like a camelback sofa. But if you have to choose between these two, I vote for the Karlstad. Better lines. You can soften it up with pillows.

Anonymous said...

Karlstad is better! BR from an IKEA worker in Rome :)

bizio24@hotmail.com

Koda said...

I personally like the Kivik, makes the room look bigger because the couch looks smaller, it also isn't very high up which is more useful than most people think. Only thing I do not like about the Kivik is the back cushions, they look a bit too big and semi random lines are kind of odd to me, not bad, just different.